Difference between revisions of "Motorcycle safety"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
35 bytes removed ,  03:34, 15 June 2010
m
Line 46: Line 46:
===MAIDS report===
===MAIDS report===
{{main|MAIDS report}}
{{main|MAIDS report}}
The most recent large-scale study of motorcycle accidents is the [[MAIDS report]] carried out in five European countries in 1999-2000, using the rigorous [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]] standards, including a statistically significant sample size of over 900 crash incidents and over 900 [[Case-control study|control]] cases.
The most recent large-scale study of motorcycle accidents is the [[MAIDS report]] carried out in five European countries in 1999-2000, using the rigorous Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development standards, including a statistically significant sample size of over 900 crash incidents and over 900 control cases.


The MAIDS report tends to support most of the Hurt Report findings, for example that "69% of the OV &#91;other vehicle&#93; drivers attempted no collision avoidance manoeuvre," suggesting they did not see the motorcycle.  And further that, "the largest number of PTW [powered two-wheeler] accidents is due to a perception failure on the part of the OV driver or the PTW rider."  And "The data indicates that in 68.7% of all cases, the helmet was capable of preventing or reducing the head injury sustained by the rider (i.e., 33.2% + 35.5%). In 3.6% of all cases, the helmet was found to have no effect upon head injury" and "There were no reported cases in which the helmet was identified as the contact code for a serious or maximum neck injury."<ref>{{Citation |title=Maids &ndash; In-Depth Investigation of Motorcycle Accidents |chapter=Main findings of the MAIDS report on accident characteristics | publisher=The Association of European Motorcycle Manufacturers (ACEM) |year=2009 |url=http://www.maids-study.eu/maids_report.html}}</ref>
The MAIDS report tends to support most of the Hurt Report findings, for example that "69% of the OV &#91;other vehicle&#93; drivers attempted no collision avoidance manoeuvrings," suggesting they did not see the motorcycle.  And further that, "the largest number of powered two-wheeler accidents is due to a perception failure on the part of the OV driver or the PTW rider."  And "The data indicates that in 68.7% of all cases, the helmet was capable of preventing or reducing the head injury sustained by the rider (i.e., 33.2% + 35.5%). In 3.6% of all cases, the helmet was found to have no effect upon head injury" and "There were no reported cases in which the helmet was identified as the contact code for a serious or maximum neck injury."<ref>{{Citation |title=Maids &ndash; In-Depth Investigation of Motorcycle Accidents |chapter=Main findings of the MAIDS report on accident characteristics | publisher=The Association of European Motorcycle Manufacturers (ACEM) |year=2009 |url=http://www.maids-study.eu/maids_report.html}}</ref>


===Conflicting findings on conspicuity===
===Conflicting findings on conspicuity===

Navigation menu