22,449
edits
m (→Accident rates) |
m (→MAIDS report) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
===MAIDS report=== | ===MAIDS report=== | ||
{{main|MAIDS report}} | {{main|MAIDS report}} | ||
The most recent large-scale study of motorcycle accidents is the [[MAIDS report]] carried out in five European countries in 1999-2000, using the rigorous | The most recent large-scale study of motorcycle accidents is the [[MAIDS report]] carried out in five European countries in 1999-2000, using the rigorous Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development standards, including a statistically significant sample size of over 900 crash incidents and over 900 control cases. | ||
The MAIDS report tends to support most of the Hurt Report findings, for example that "69% of the OV [other vehicle] drivers attempted no collision avoidance | The MAIDS report tends to support most of the Hurt Report findings, for example that "69% of the OV [other vehicle] drivers attempted no collision avoidance manoeuvrings," suggesting they did not see the motorcycle. And further that, "the largest number of powered two-wheeler accidents is due to a perception failure on the part of the OV driver or the PTW rider." And "The data indicates that in 68.7% of all cases, the helmet was capable of preventing or reducing the head injury sustained by the rider (i.e., 33.2% + 35.5%). In 3.6% of all cases, the helmet was found to have no effect upon head injury" and "There were no reported cases in which the helmet was identified as the contact code for a serious or maximum neck injury."<ref>{{Citation |title=Maids – In-Depth Investigation of Motorcycle Accidents |chapter=Main findings of the MAIDS report on accident characteristics | publisher=The Association of European Motorcycle Manufacturers (ACEM) |year=2009 |url=http://www.maids-study.eu/maids_report.html}}</ref> | ||
===Conflicting findings on conspicuity=== | ===Conflicting findings on conspicuity=== |