71,744
edits
(initial) |
m (no summary specified) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|dry_weight = | |dry_weight = | ||
|wet_weight = | |wet_weight = | ||
|fuel_capacity = 6.8 | |fuel_capacity = 6.8 Liters / 1.8 US gal | ||
|oil_capacity = | |oil_capacity = | ||
|fuel_consumption = | |fuel_consumption = | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
==Chassis== | ==Chassis== | ||
It came with a 2.50 x 19 front [[tire]] and a 3.00 x 16 rear tire. Stopping was achieved via Drum in the front and a Drum in the rear. The front suspension was a 27mm Air adjustable hydraulic forks while the rear was equipped with a Dual dampers adjustable for preload. The MT50 / MT 5 Tornado was fitted with a 6.8 | It came with a 2.50 x 19 front [[tire]] and a 3.00 x 16 rear tire. Stopping was achieved via Drum in the front and a Drum in the rear. The front suspension was a 27mm Air adjustable hydraulic forks while the rear was equipped with a Dual dampers adjustable for preload. The MT50 / MT 5 Tornado was fitted with a 6.8 Liters / 1.8 US gal fuel tank. | ||
== Photos == | == Photos == | ||
[[File:Honda-MT5.jpg|600px|Honda MT50 / MT 5 Tornado]] | [[File:Honda-MT5.jpg|600px|Honda MT50 / MT 5 Tornado]] | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
stripped of their bodywork, the two machines are actually completely | stripped of their bodywork, the two machines are actually completely | ||
different. Its the same story with the fuel capacity, the MB has a larger | different. Its the same story with the fuel capacity, the MB has a larger | ||
range, | range, 9liters compared to the MTs 6.8, with the former machines tank | ||
running right under the seat to provide the extra space. This area under the | running right under the seat to provide the extra space. This area under the | ||
seat on the MT is home to the 1.5 litre two stroke oil tank while strangely | seat on the MT is home to the 1.5 litre two stroke oil tank while strangely | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
sort of work to, whereas the majority of 50s are held back by a restriction | sort of work to, whereas the majority of 50s are held back by a restriction | ||
in the exhaust, the MT suffered a more complete method, with the | in the exhaust, the MT suffered a more complete method, with the | ||
carburetor, barrel, exhaust and even the CDI ignition all being used to | |||
downsize the power output and keep it within the letter or the UK learner | downsize the power output and keep it within the letter or the UK learner | ||
law. This meant in effect that there was little that could be done, save for | law. This meant in effect that there was little that could be done, save for | ||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Fuel Capacity | !Fuel Capacity | ||
|6.8 | |6.8 Liters / 1.8 US gal | ||
|} | |} |