71,744
edits
Difference between revisions of "Kawasaki GPz750R"
template fixes
m (no summary specified) |
(template fixes) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Motorcycle | ||
|name = | |name = Kawasaki GPz750R | ||
| | |photo=Kawasaki-GPZ750F-84--1.jpg | ||
|aka = GPz 750 R | |aka = GPz 750 R | ||
|manufacturer = Kawasaki | |manufacturer = Kawasaki | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|dry_weight = 228 kg / 502.5 lbs | |dry_weight = 228 kg / 502.5 lbs | ||
|wet_weight = | |wet_weight = | ||
|fuel_capacity = 22 | |fuel_capacity = 22 Liters / 5.8 US gal | ||
|oil_capacity = | |oil_capacity = | ||
|recommended_oil=K-tech 10W-40 | |||
|fuel_consumption = | |fuel_consumption = | ||
|turning_radius = | |turning_radius = | ||
| Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
==Chassis== | ==Chassis== | ||
It came with a 120/80-16 front [[tire]] and a 130/80-18 rear tire. Stopping was achieved via 2x 270mm discs in the front and a Single 256mm disc in the rear. The front suspension was a Air assisted forks, 160mm wheel travel. while the rear was equipped with a Single shock swinging arm, 109mm wheel travel.. The GPz750R was fitted with a 22 | It came with a 120/80-16 front [[tire]] and a 130/80-18 rear tire. Stopping was achieved via 2x 270mm discs in the front and a Single 256mm disc in the rear. The front suspension was a Air assisted forks, 160mm wheel travel. while the rear was equipped with a Single shock swinging arm, 109mm wheel travel.. The GPz750R was fitted with a 22 Liters / 5.8 US gal fuel tank. The bike weighed just 228 kg / 502.5 lbs. The wheelbase was 1495 mm / 58.8 in long. | ||
== Photos == | == Photos == | ||
[[File:Kawasaki-GPZ750F-84--1.jpg|600px|Kawasaki GPz750R]] | [[File:Kawasaki-GPZ750F-84--1.jpg|600px|Kawasaki GPz750R]] | ||
| Line 83: | Line 84: | ||
leg over one of the new generation of 750s we featured in the three-way test | leg over one of the new generation of 750s we featured in the three-way test | ||
in the June '83 issue. I remember that the conclusions expressed by those | in the June '83 issue. I remember that the conclusions expressed by those | ||
who were involved in that test were mostly in | who were involved in that test were mostly in favor of the muc ho flash | ||
V-four Honda and the completely revamped GSX750 Suzuki. There was a | V-four Honda and the completely revamped GSX750 Suzuki. There was a | ||
decided feeling of reservation, however, when it came to discussing the | decided feeling of reservation, however, when it came to discussing the | ||
| Line 431: | Line 432: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Fuel Capacity | !Fuel Capacity | ||
|22 | |22 Liters / 5.8 US gal | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Consumption Average | !Consumption Average | ||